Kalshi and California Betting Law Examined in Opinion

California prohibits online sports betting, but Kalshi offers outcome-based contracts under federal regulation, according to an Oct. 21 opinion column in the Napa Valley Register. Author Mark G. Epstein examines that regulatory distinction and the legal challenges to Kalshi’s model; the column does not report a new ruling or change in California law.

Federal oversight and challenges to Kalshi

Epstein describes Kalshi as accepting wagers through futures contracts and identifies the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as the federal regulator. According to the column, Kalshi and competing prediction markets offer contracts on a range of outcomes, including elections.

The column also says several states and gambling interests are suing Kalshi, arguing that its products are betting and should fall under state control. It does not identify the lawsuits, provide their procedural status or report a decision resolving those arguments.

The distinction between federally regulated contracts and state-regulated gambling is the central legal issue discussed in the piece. The column does not establish that federal oversight settles every question about Kalshi’s operation in California.

California election forecasts cited in the column

Epstein cites Kalshi probabilities of 98% for Xavier Becerra to win the gubernatorial contest and 80% for Mike Thompson to win his congressional race. Those figures are market forecasts reported in the opinion column, not election results.

The author separately predicts that St. Helena’s Measure S will fail and that the countywide Measure B sales tax for parks and fire safety will pass. Those are Epstein’s predictions, not reported Kalshi market probabilities or confirmed outcomes.

—

Source: As reported by The Napa Valley Register.

This article was created with the assistance of AI and is monitored by our editorial team.